Yesterday the DDB WWF ad sparked a little debate round the office on the subject of shock ads, it was amazing how quickly and fiercly the fuse burnt once lit! THis section of the email trail literally flew around in under five minutes. Some interesting questions were raised, does the message get lost? Is any conversation good conversation? Do shock ads work? What I really would like to see is what impact the ad has on donations after this little storm. Anyone else have an opinion?
Read from the bottom up.
From: Wade
Ahhhh … but we are critiquing the ad from the perspective of “is that an
inappropriate message in relation to 9/11?”
The WWF message is getting lost …….. we are debating the WRONG topic.
Well done Drew – you Sh*t starter …….. my turn now
Ok … so which religion is BETTER Christianity or Buddhism?
From: Chris
Can an ad’s success be measured
by the conversation it produces or the opinions it polarises?
From: Phillip
Agree with all comments, Wade
definitely agree comparing man made to nature is ridiculous. What we need to do
with things like the tsunami is humanise them, they are seen as things that
happen somewhere else and a number is just a number.
Having said this look at the
email trail, definitely got the office talking about serious issues....
From: Kristina
Fair point, but surely there is a better way to show the value of
third world life than belittle that of the US?
Though I guess it may indirectly touch an element of human nature we
might not like to admit – we only instill value on something by taking it away
from something else.
If we are talking about minute silences, there isn’t actually anything
official for 9/11 in the States that I’m aware of… or the Bali bombing for that
matter which was in the same vicinity of the tsunami..
Lots of talking points here Drew, nice debate starter!!!!
From: Tom
Disagree.
I think it makes an important point (perhaps unwittingly) about the
value of third world life in relation to US lives. Where is the one minute of
silence for the Tsunami victims (which seems far more relevant to Australia
than terrorism to me).
From: Nikk
I completely agree. Never would have thought an organization like the
WWF would stoop this low and feel it necessary to compare with and almost
belittle 9/11.
The hell?!!
From: Kristina
Agreed Wade.
I actually find that disgusting – the comparison holds no merit
whatsoever, how can you compare the two?!?
And more importantly WHY should we compare the two?! They are two
equally devastating events, the body count should absolutely not be used as a
hook to “respect” one over the other..
Very powerful image and it will no doubt get people talking but I think
it’s a really poor way of getting this message across.
From: Wade
FAIL
I get that they tapped into the destruction of 911 because of the global
impact that story had to get cut through, but it feels a little icky because
the comparison is made to a man made act of terrorism which takes it off brief
in my opinion.
I look at the ad more like - “imagine if terrorism escalated”
rather than going “isn’t mother nature a powerful thing that should be
respected.”
From: Drew
http://blog.stephengates.com/2009/09/03/ddb-wwf-tsunami-twin-towers-ad-powerful-or-despicable/